## References

**To download TI-supported research on math and science education, visit the global ****TI Research Library**.

AEL, T. I. f. t. A. o. R. i. E. a. (2004). Review of the research: Nine components of effective professional development. Charleston, WV, AEL.

Aldon, G., M. Artigue, et al. (2008). New technological environment, new resources, new way of working: the e-CoLab project (Collaborative Mathematics Laboratory experiment). Lyon, France, Research Institute on Mathematical Education (IREM) & National Institute on Education Research (IREM) & University of Lyon & University of Montpelier.

Aldon, G. and H. Sabra (2009). The Integration of calculators in mathematics teaching: a new stage of technology, new forms of integration, a new type of experimentation. (TR). Lyon, France, Institut National de Recherche Pédagogique.

Alexander, C. and W. Stroup (2006). Richardson Math Project Final Report: Math TAKS Results. Austin, TX, University of Texas at Austin.

Arzarello, F. (2009). Report on the TI-Nspire Experimentation in Two Italian Classrooms 2007-2008 Turin, Italy, University of Turin.

Bohm, J., I. Forbes, et al. (2004). The Case for CAS. Munster, Germany, Westfalische Wilhelms-Universitat.

Bostic, J. and S. J. Pape (2008). "Examining Students' Perceptions of Graphing Calculator Use During Instruction and

Problem-Solutions Following Technology-Enhanced Instruction." Pre-publication draft.

Bouck, E. C. (2007). 6th Graders with Disabilities using 4-functon Calculators: What one study says. TI EdTech Research Note #4. R. Foshay. Dallas, TX, Purdue University.

Bruder, R. (2008). TIM – A two-year Model test on the calculator use from class 7 and 9. The Joint Meeting of the 32nd Conference of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education, and the XX North American Chapter. O. Figueras and A. Sepúlveda. Morelia, Michoacán, México, PME.

Bu, L. (2010). A Case Study of Investigating Preservice Mathematics Teachers' Initial Use of the Next-Generation TI-Nspire Graphing Calculators with Regard to TPACK. SITE 2010. San Diego, Florida State University

Learning Systems Institute.

Burrill, G., J. Allison, et al. (2002). "Handheld graphing technology in secondary school mathematics: Research findings and implications for classroom practice. Dallas, TX: Texas Instruments. Available at http//education.ti.com/sites/US/downloads/pdf/CL2872.pdf."

Burrill, G. and G. Breaux (2009). The Impact of Graphing Calculators on Student Performance in Beginning Algebra: An Exploratory Study (Synopsis). : . East Lansing, MI, Michigan State University.

Center for Technology in Learning, S. I. (2004). Research Relating to TI-Navigator. Menlo Park, CA, SRI International: 8pp.

Center for Technology in Learning, S. I. (2007). How can teachers translate students' positive attitudes towards ICTs into better mathematics learning? TI EdTech Research Note #12. R. Foshay. Dallas, TX, SRI International.

Center for Technology in Learning, S. I. (2007). The Pedagogical Potential of TI-Nspire. TI EdTech Research Note #9. R. Foshay. Dallas, TX, SRI International.

Center for Technology in Learning, S. I. (2007). Why is having access to portable handheld devices in a teacher's own math classroom better than going to an ICT suite? TI EdTech Research Note #11. R. Foshay. Dallas, Tx, SRI International.

Center for Technology in Learning, S. I. (2007). Why should a teacher use technology in his or her mathematics classroom. TI EdTech Research Note #8. R. Foshay. Dallas, TX, SRI International.

Center for Technology in Learning, S. I. (2007). Why should mathematics educators consider using technology with Computer Algebra System (CAS) features? TI EdTech Research Note #10. R. Foshay. Dallas Tx, SRI International.

Center for Technology in Learning, S. I. (2008). How does classroom use of TI-Nspire™ and the TI-Nspire™ Navigator™ System enhance student engagement, collaboration and learning? TI EdTech Research Note #13. R. Foshay. Dallas, TX, Texas Instruments.

Center for Technology in Learning, S. I. (2008). Should graphing calculators be allowed on important tests? TI EdTech Research Note #2. R. Foshay. Dallas, TX, Texas Instruments.

Center for Technology in Learning, S. I. (2008). What are the benefits of graphing calculators for students in developmental mathematics courses at the post-secondary level? TI EdTech Research Note #1. R. Foshay. Dallas, TX, Texas Instruments.

Center for Technology in Learning, S. I. (2008). Why invest in improving Algebra 2 and beyond? TI EdTech Research Note #7. R. Foshay. Dallas, TX, SRI International.

Center for Technology in Learning, S. I. (2009). Does teacher knowledge of students' thinking in a network-connected classroom improve mathematics achievement? TI EdTech Research Note #14. Dallas, TX, Texas Instruments.

Center for Technology in Learning, S. I. (2009). Should students have frequent access to graphing calculators? TI EdTech Research Notes #3. Dallas, TX, Texas Instruments.

Center for Technology in Learning, S. I. (2009). Systemic vs. One time Teacher Professional Development: What Does Research Say? TI EdTech Research Note #15. Dallas, TX, Texas Instruments.

Clark-Wilson, A. (2008). Evaluating TI-Nspire in secondary mathematics classrooms. Chichester, UK, The Mathematics Centre of University of Chichester.

Clark-Wilson, A. (2009). Connecting mathematics in the connected classroom:TI-Nspire™ Navigator™. Chichester, UK, The Mathematics Centre- University of Chichester.

Clark-Wilson, A. (2010). Connecting mathematics in a connected classroom: Teachers emergent practices within a collaborative learning environment. Chichester, University of Chichester.|

Clark-Wilson, A. (2010). "Emergent pedagogies and the changing role of the teacher in the TI-Nspire Navigator-networked mathematics classroom." __ZDM__: 1-15.

Connors, M. A. and K. G. Snook (2001). "The Effects of Hand-Held CAS on Student Achievement in a First Year College Core Calculus Sequence." The International Journal of Computer Algebra in Mathematics Education 8(2): 99-114.

Dick, T. and G. Burrill (2009). Tough to Teach/Tough to Learn: Research Basis, Framework, and Principles for a Practical Application of TI-Nspire Technology in the Math Nspired series. Dallas, TX, Texas Instruments, Inc.

Dimock, V. and T. Sherron (2005). Final Report of A Study of the Impact of Graphing Calculator Use on State Assessments. Austin, TX, Southwest Educational Development Laboratory: 123.

Dougherty, B. J., K. Akana, et al. (2005). TI-Navigator Technology and Algebra I. Honolulu, HI, University of Hawaii CRDG: 28.

Duncan, A. (2010). Teachers' views on dynamically linked multiple representations and relational understanding of mathematics - an investigation into the use of TI-Nspire in Scottish secondary schools. Aberdeen, Scotland, University of Aberdeen.

Ellington, A. J. (2003). "A meta-analysis of the effects of calculators on students' achievement and attitude levels in precollege mathematics classes." Journal for Research in Mathematics Education 34(5): 433-463.

Empirical Education, I. (2009). Richardson ISD: Impact of TI MathForward on Mathematics Achievement for General Mathematics and Algebra I Students. Palo Alto, CA, Empirical Education, Inc.

Gantz, L. A. G. (2008). The Effects of the TI-Nspire CAS on Student Learning. Washington, DC, George Mason University: 41.

Goulding, M. (2008). "The role of ICTs in learning algebra: a systematic review." Research in Mathematics Education 10(1): 93-94.

Guerrero, S., N. Walker, et al. (2004). "Technology in support of middle grade mathematics: what have we learned?(Third International Mathematics and Science Study)(National Council of Teachers of Mathematics)." Journal of Computers in Mathematics and Science Teaching 23(1): 5(16).

Harskamp, E. G., C. J. M. Suhre, et al. (1998). "The Graphics Calculator in Mathematics Education: An Experiment in the Netherlands." Hiroshima Journal of Mathematics Education 6: 13-31.

Harskamp, E. S., Cor; Van Streun, Anno (2000). "The Graphics Calculator and Students' Solution Strategies." Mathematics Education Research Journal 12(1): 37-52.

Hegedus, S. (2007). Lessons from SimCalc: What research says. TI EdTech Research Note #6. R. Foshay. Dartmouth, MA, University of Massachusetts - Dartmouth.

Heller, J. I., D. A. Curtis, et al. (2005). The Impact of Handheld Graphing Calculator Use on Student Achievement in Algebra 1: 70.

Helsel, F. K. I., J. H. Hitchcock, et al. (2006). Identifying Evidence-Based, Promising and Emerging Practices That Use Screen-Based and Calculator Technology to Teach Mathematics in Grades K-12: A Research Synthesis. American Educational Research Association. San Francisco, Center for Implementing Technology in Education (CITEd).

Hivon, L., M. Pean, et al. (2008). From a network of calculators to collaborative construction in the class. Lyon, France, University of Lyon & IREM & INRP: 23.

Kastberg, S. and K. Leatham (2005). "Research On Graphing Calculators at the Secondary Level: Implications for Mathematics Teacher Education." Contemporary Issues in Technology and Teacher Education 5(1): 25-37.

Khojou, M., A. Jaciw, et al. (2005). Effectiveness of Graphing Calculators in K–12 Mathematics Achievement: A Systematic Review. Palo Alto, CA, Empirical Education, Inc.

Laumakis, P. and M. Herman (2008). "The Effect of a Calculator Training Workshop for High School Teachers on their Students' Performance on Florida State-Wide Assessments." International Journal for Technology in Mathematics Education 15(3): 87-93.

Lewis, J. (2008). Texas Instruments MathForward Intervention: 2007-8 Teacher Knowledge for Teaching Mathematics Assessments. R. Foshay. Redlands, CA, Winick & Lewis Research, LLC.

Lubienski, S. T., E. Camburn, et al. (2004). Reform-Oriented Mathematics Instruction, Achievement, and Equity: Examinations of Race and SES in 2000 Main NAEP Data. Washington, DC, Iowa State University & University of Wisconsin, Madison

Lyublinskaya, I. (2008). Development of Inquiry Based Mathematics Content by Teachers and Students with TI-Nspire for Mathematics Teaching and Learning. New York, NY, College of Staten Island.

Lyublinskaya, I. (2009). MathForward 2008-9 Report: North Brunswick, NJ New York, NY, City University of New York, College of Staten Island.

Lyublinskaya, I., E. Donoghue, et al. (2007). Pre-service Teachers Attitudes Toward Graphing Calculator Technologies in Learning and Teaching Mathematics and Science. T-cubed International. Chicago, IL.

Lyublinskaya, I. and N. Tournaki (2009). The Effects of the Use of Handheld Devices on Student Achievement in Algebra. Submitted to SITE 2009.

Lyublinskaya, I. and N. Tournaki (2010). "The Effect of Handheld Devices on Student Achievement in Algebra." Submitted to Educational Technology Research and Development.

Lyublinskaya, I. and N. Tournaki (2010). Integrating TI-Nspire technology into algebra classrooms: Selected factors that relate to quality of instruction Society for Information Technology and Teacher Education International Conference San Diego, CA, AACE.

McCulloch, A. W. (2011). "Affect and graphing calculator use." Journal of Mathematical Behavior 30(2): 166-179.

Meagher, M., A. Ozgun-Koca, et al. (2008). Pre-service teachers experiences with advanced digital technologies: The interplay between technology in a pre-service classroom and in field placements. New York, NY, Brooklyn College-CUNY & Wayne State University & Miami University

O'Mahony, T. K., T. Baer, et al. (2008). A Visuo-spatial Learning Ecosystem Enhances Adaptive Expertise with Preparation for Future Learning. I. S. T. K. Principal Investigator, University of Washington. Seattle, WA, University of Washington, College of Education.

Owens, D. T., S. J. Pape, et al. (2008). The Connected Algebra Classroom: A Randomized Control Trial. International Conference on Math Education Research (ICME-11). Monterrey, Mexico: 7.

Pape, S. J., K. E. Irving, et al. (2008). The impact of classroom connectivity in promoting Algebra I achievement: Results of a randomized control trial. American Educational Research Association (AERA). New York, NY, Ohio State University: 50.

Penuel, W. and C. Singleton (2010). "Classroom Network Technology as a Support for Systemic Mathematics Reform: Examining the Effects of Texas Instruments' MathForward Program on Student Achievement in a Large, Diverse District." Journal of Computers in Mathematics and Science Teaching (JCMST).

Penuel, W. R. (2008). MathForward District Report: Brentwood, CA Union School District. MathForward Evaluation Series. R. Foshay. Menlo Park, CA, SRI International.

Penuel, W. R. (2008). MathForward District Report: Canton, OH Local School District. MathForward Evaluation Series. R. Foshay. Menlo Park, CA, SRI International.

Penuel, W. R. (2008). MathForward District Report: Dallas, TX Independent School District. MathForward Evaluation Series. R. Foshay. Menlo Park, CA, SRI International.

Penuel, W. R. (2008). MathForward District Report: Euclid, OH. MathForward Evaluation Series. R. Foshay. Menlo Park, CA, SRI International.

Penuel, W. R. (2008). MathForward District Report: Jackson, OH Local Schools. MathForward Evaluation Series. R. Foshay. Menlo Park, CA, SRI International.

Penuel, W. R. (2008). MathForward District Report: Levittown, NY Union Free School District. MathForward Evaluation Series. R. Foshay. Menlo Park, CA, SRI International.

Penuel, W. R. (2008). MathForward District Report: Richardson, Texas Independent School District. MathForward Evaluation Series. R. Foshay. Menlo Park, CA, SRI International.

Penuel, W. R. (2008). MathForward District Report: Springfield, OH Local School District. MathForward Evaluation Series. R. Foshay. Menlo Park, CA, SRI International.

Penuel, W. R. (2008). MathForward District Report: West Palm Beach County, FL School District. MathForward Evaluation Series. R. Foshay. Menlo Park, CA, SRI International.

Penuel, W. R. (2008). Technical Report: Analysis of Effects of MathForwardTM on Student Achievement in Richardson Independent School District (RISD). MathForward Evaluation

Research Series. Menlo Park, CA, SRI International.

Pham, V. (2009). Gear Up III "Creating a Vision" Analysis Report for 2008-2009 Academic Year. Austin, TX, University of Texas - Austin.

Rivera, F. (2007). "Accounting for Students' Schemes in the Development of a Graphical Process for Solving Polynomial Inequalities in Instrumented Activity

" Educational Studies in Mathematics.

Rivera, F. D. (2007). How graphing calculators build deep understanding: what one study says. TI EdTech Research Note #5. R. Foshay. Dallas, TX.

Roschelle, J. (2009). Towards Highly Interactive Classrooms: Improving Mathematics Teaching and Learning with TI-Nspire Navigator. Menlo Park, CA, SRI Center for Technology and Learning, SRI International.

Roschelle, J. and L. Gallagher (2005). A Research Perspective on Using Graphing Calculator Interventions to Improve Mathematics Achievement. Palo Alto, CA, SRI International: 12.

Roschelle, J. and C. Singleton (2008). Graphing Calculators: Enhancing Math Learning for All Students. International Handbook of Information Technology in Primary and Secondary Education. J. Vogt and G. Knezek. New York, Springer: 951-962.

Sabra, H. (2008). Revue d'articles francophones sur l'integration

des calculatrices dans des mathematics, 2002-2008. L. Trouche. Lyon, France, INRP.

Sinclair, M., R. Owston, et al. (2009). TI-Navigator Study Final Report. Toronto, CA, York University.

Slovin, H., M. Olson, et al. (2010). Changing the Mathematics Teaching and Learning Environment Through the Use of Networked Technology. Hawai'i International Conference on Education 2010. Honolulu, HI.

Spector, J. M., E. Jakubowski, et al. (2008). Investigating Pre-service Mathematics Teachers' Initial Use of the Next-Generation TI-Nspire Graphing Calculators: A Case Study. Tallahassee, FL, Florida Center for Research on STEM education (FCR-STEM), Learning Systems Institute, Florida State University.

SRI (2006). TI-Nspire™ Math and Science Learning Handhelds: What Research Says and What Educators Can Do. Menlo Park, CA, SRI International.

SRI_International (2009). A comprehensive framework for improving mathematics in low-performing secondary schools. TI Research Notes #16. Dallas, TX, Texas Instruments.

SRI_International (2009). How can teachers use technology to help students with special needs improve learning in mathematics? TI Research Notes. Dallas, TX, Texas Instruments, Inc.

Stroup, W. and C. Alexander (2007). Richardson Math Project Second Year Final Report: Math TAKS Results. Austin, TX, University of Texas at Austin.

Stroup, W., L. Carmona, et al. (2005). Improving on Expectations: Preliminary Results from Using Network-Supported Function-Based Algebra. Annual conference of the North American Chapter of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education.

Stroup, W. and V. Pham (2009). ADDENDUM TO THE RICHARDSON MATHFORWARD PROGRAM ANALYSIS REPORT. Austin, TX, University of Texas - Austin.

Toenjes, L., J. Lewis, et al. (2004). Identifying Components of Effective Mathematics Programs. Eugene, OR, University of Oregon.

Vendlinski, T. P. (2009). The importance of intention and order: teaching for conceptual understanding using handheld technology. Los Angeles, National Center for Research on Evaluation, Standards, and Student Testing (CRESST), University of California, Los Angeles.

Vendlinski, T. P., J. Morris, et al. (2008). A small randomized experiment in Algebra showed that when using TI-Nspire (in TI-84 mode), conceptual instruction followed by instruction that integrates both concepts and procedures was the most efficacious in helping students learn to begin writing linear equations. . Los Angeles, University of California - Los Angeles.

Weigand, H.-G. (2008). "Teaching with a Symbolic Calculator in 10th Grade - Evaluation of a One Year Project." International Journal for Technology in Mathematics Education 15(1): 19-32.

Winick, M. and J. Lewis (2006). Year 1 Assessment of the RISD-TI Intervention Model. Redlands, CA, Winick & Lewis Research, LLC.

Winick, M. and J. Lewis (2007). TI-Euclid City School District MathForward Intervention 2007 Year End Report. MathForward Evaluation Series. Dallas, TX, Texas Instruments.

Winick, M. and J. Lewis (2007). Year 2 Assessment of MathForward in RISD. Redlands, CA, Winick & Lewis, LLC.

Zeller, M., B. Barzel, et al. (2009). CAYEN First Report, January 2009 - August 2009. Freiburg, Germany, Institute for Mathematics, University of Education, Friburg.

Zeller, M. and B. Barzel (2010). "Influences of CAS and GC in early algebra." ZDM 42(7): 775-788.