References
 | AEL, T. I. f. t. A. o. R. i. E. a. (2004). Review of the research: Nine components of effective professional development. Charleston, WV, AEL. (PDF)
Aldon, G., M. Artigue, et al. (2008). New technological environment, new resources, new way of working: the e-CoLab project (Collaborative Mathematics Laboratory experiment). Lyon, France, Research Institute on Mathematical Education (IREM); National Institute on Education Research (IREM). (PDF)
Alexander, C. and W. Stroup (2006). Richardson Math Project Final Report: Math TAKS Results. Austin, TX, University of Texas at Austin. (PDF)
Bohm, J., I. Forbes, et al. (2004). The Case for CAS. Munster, Germany, Westfalische Wilhelms-Universitat.
Bouck, E. and A. Yadav (2006). A Differential Effect for Graphing Calculator Use? Exploring this tool for seventh grade students with and without disabilities. Technology and Media Division Conference. San Diego, CA, Department of Educational Studies Purdue University. (PDF)
Bruder, R. (2008). TIM - A two-year Model test on the calculator use from class 7 and 9. The Joint Meeting of the 32nd Conference of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education, and the XX North American Chapter. O. Figueras and A. Sepúlveda. Morelia, Michoacán, México, PME. (PDF)
Burrill, G., J. Allison, et al. (2002). "Handheld graphing technology in secondary school mathematics: Research findings and implications for classroom practice. Dallas, TX: Texas Instruments. (PDF)
Burrill, G. and G. Breaux (2009). The Impact of Graphing Calculators on Student Performance in Beginning Algebra: An Exploratory Study (Synopsis). : . East Lansing, MI, Michigan State University. (PDF)
Center for Technology in Learning, S. I. (2004). Research Relating to TI-Navigator. Menlo Park, CA, SRI International: 8pp.
Center for Technology in Learning, S. I. (2007). How can teachers translate students' positive attitudes towards ICTs into better mathematics learning? TI EdTech Research Notes. R. Foshay. Dallas, TX, SRI International. (PDF )
Center for Technology in Learning, S. I. (2007). The Pedagogical Potential of TI-Nspire. TI EdTech Research Notes. R. Foshay. Dallas, TX, SRI International. (PDF )
Center for Technology in Learning, S. I. (2007). Why is having access to portable handheld devices in a teacher's own math classroom better than going to an ICT suite? TI EdTech Research Notes. R. Foshay. Dallas, Tx, SRI International. (PDF )
Center for Technology in Learning, S. I. (2007). Why should a teacher use technology in his or her mathematics classroom. TI EdTech Research Notes. R. Foshay. Dallas, TX, SRI International. (PDF )
Center for Technology in Learning, S. I. (2007). Why should mathematics educators consider using technology with Computer Algebra System (CAS) features? TI EdTech Research Notes. R. Foshay. Dallas Tx, SRI International. (PDF )
Center for Technology in Learning, S. I. (2008). Should graphing calculators be allowed on important tests? TI EdTech Research Notes. R. Foshay. Dallas, TX, Texas Instruments. (PDF )
Center for Technology in Learning, S. I. (2009). Should students have frequent access to graphing calculators? TI EdTech Research Notes. R. Foshay. Dallas, TX, Texas Instruments. (PDF )
Center for Technology in Learning, S. I. (2009). Systemic vs. One time Teacher Professional Development: What Does Research Say? . Texas Instruments Research Note #15. Dallas, TX, Texas Instruments. (PDF)
Center for Technology in Learning, S. I. (2008). What are the benefits of graphing calculators for students in developmental mathematics courses at the post-secondary level? TI EdTech Research Notes. R. Foshay. Dallas, TX, Texas Instruments. (PDF )
Center for Technology in Learning, S. I. (2009). Does teacher knowledge of students’ thinking in a network-connected classroom improve mathematics achievement? TI Research Note #13. Menlo Park, CA: SRI International. (PDF)
Clark-Wilson, A. (2008). Evaluating TI-Nspire in secondary mathematics classrooms. Chichester, UK, The Mathematics Centre of University of Chichester. (PDF )
Connors, M. A. and K. G. Snook (2001). "The Effects of Hand-Held CAS on Student Achievement in a First Year College Core Calculus Sequence." The International Journal of Computer Algebra in Mathematics Education 8(2): 99-114.
Dick, T. and G. Burrill (2009). Tough to Teach/Tough to Learn: Research Basis, Framework, and Principles for a Practical Application of TI-Nspire Technology in the Math Nspired series. Dallas, TX, Texas Instruments, Inc. (PDF)
Dimock, V. and T. Sherron (2004). "A Study of the Impact of Graphing Calculator Use on State Asessment." Research Analysis: SEDL Graphing and TAKS. (PDF)
Dougherty, B. J., K. Akana, et al. (2005). TI-Navigator Technology and Algebra I. Honolulu, HI, University of Hawaii CRDG: 28. Education, T. I. f. t. A. o. R. i. (2004). Review of the research: Nine components of effective professional development. Charleston, WV, AEL. (PDF)
Ellington, A. J. (2003). "A meta-analysis of the effects of calculators on students' achievement and attitude levels in precollege mathematics classes." Journal for Research in Mathematics Education 34(5): 433-463.
Gantz, L. A. G. (2008). The Effects of the TI-Nspire CAS on Student Learning. Washington, DC, George Mason University: 41. (PDF)
Goulding, M. (2008). "The role of ICTs in learning algebra: a systematic review." Research in Mathematics Education 10(1): 93-94.
Guerrero, S., N. Walker, et al. (2004). "Technology in support of middle grade mathematics: what have we learned?(Third International Mathematics and Science Study)(National Council of Teachers of Mathematics)." Journal of Computers in Mathematics and Science Teaching 23(1): 5(16).
Harskamp, E. G., C. J. M. Suhre, et al. (1998). "The Graphics Calculator in Mathematics Education: An Experiment in the Netherlands." Hiroshima Journal of Mathematics Education 6: 13-31.
Harskamp, E. S., Cor; Van Streun, Anno (2000). "The Graphics Calculator and Students' Solution Strategies." Mathematics Education Research Journal 12(1): 37-52.
Hegedus, S. (2007). Lessons from SimCalc: What research says. TI EdTech Research Notes. R. Foshay. Dartmouth, MA, University of Massachusetts - Dartmouth.(PDF)
Heller, J. I., D. A. Curtis, et al. (2005). The Impact of Handheld Graphing Calculator Use on Student Achievement in Algebra 1: 70. (PDF)
Helsel, F. K. I., J. H. Hitchcock, et al. (2006). Identifying Evidence-Based, Promising and Emerging Practices That Use Screen-Based and Calculator Technology to Teach Mathematics in Grades K-12: A Research Synthesis. American Educational Research Association. San Francisco, Center for Implementing Technology in Education (CITEd).
Hivon, L., M. Pean, et al. (2008). From a network of calculators to collaborative construction in the class. Lyon, France, University of Lyon. (PDF)
Khojou, M., A. Jaciw, et al. (2005). Effectiveness of Graphing Calculators in K-12 Mathematics Achievement: A Systematic Review. Palo Alto, CA, Empirical Education, Inc. (PDF)
Laumakis, P. and M. Herman (2008). "The Effect of a Calculator Training Workshop for High School Teachers on their Students' Performance on Florida State-Wide Assessments." International Journal for Technology in Mathematics Education 15(3): 87-93.
Lewis, J. (2008). Texas Instruments MathForward Intervention: 2007-8 Teacher Knowledge for Teaching Mathematics Assessments. R. Foshay. Redlands, CA, Winick & Lewis Research, LLC. (PDF)
Lubienski, S. T., E. Camburn, et al. (2004). Reform-Oriented Mathematics Instruction, Achievement, and Equity: Examinations of Race and SES in 2000 Main NAEP Data. Washington, DC, Iowa State University
Lyublinskaya, I. (2008). Development of Inquiry Based Mathematics Content by Teachers and Students with TI-Nspire for Mathematics Teaching and Learning. New York, NY, College of Staten Island. (PDF )
Lyublinskaya, I., E. Donoghue, et al. (2007). Pre-service Teachers Attitudes Toward Graphing Calculator Technologies in Learning and Teaching Mathematics and Science. T-cubed International. Chicago, IL.
Meagher, M., A. Ozgun-Koca, et al. (2008). Pre-service teachers experiences with advanced digital technologies: The interplay between technology in a pre-service classroom and in field placements. New York, NY, Brooklyn College-CUNY, Wayne State University, Miami University (PDF)
O’Mahony, T. K., T. Baer, et al. (2008). A Visuo-spatial Learning Ecosystem Enhances Adaptive Expertise with Preparation for Future Learning. I. S. T. K. Principal Investigator, University of Washington. Seattle, WA, University of Washington, College of Education. (PDF)
Owens, D. T., S. J. Pape, et al. (2008). The Connected Algebra Classroom: A Randomized Control Trial. International Conference on Math Education Research (ICME-11). Monterrey, Mexico: 7.
Penuel, W. R. (2008). MathForward District Report: Brentwood, CA Union School District. MathForward Evaluation Series. R. Foshay. Menlo Park, CA, SRI International. (PDF )
Penuel, W. R. (2008). MathForward District Report: Canton, OH Local School District. MathForward Evaluation Series. R. Foshay. Menlo Park, CA, SRI International. (PDF )
Penuel, W. R. (2008). MathForward District Report: Euclid, OH. MathForward Evaluation Series. R. Foshay. Menlo Park, CA, SRI International. (PDF )
Penuel, W. R. (2008). MathForward District Report: Jackson, OH Local Schools. MathForward Evaluation Series. R. Foshay. Menlo Park, CA, SRI International. (PDF )
Penuel, W. R. (2008). MathForward District Report: Levittown, NY Union Free School District. MathForward Evaluation Series. R. Foshay. Menlo Park, CA, SRI International. (PDF )
Penuel, W. R. (2008). MathForward District Report: Richardson, Texas Independent School District. MathForward Evaluation Series. R. Foshay. Menlo Park, CA, SRI International. (PDF )
Penuel, W. R. (2008). MathForward District Report: Springfield, OH Local School District. MathForward Evaluation Series. R. Foshay. Menlo Park, CA, SRI International. (PDF )
Penuel, W. R. (2008). MathForward District Report: West Palm Beach County, FL School District. MathForward Evaluation Series. R. Foshay. Menlo Park, CA, SRI International.
Penuel, W. R. (2008). MathForward Implementation Quality Report. R. Foshay. Meno Park, CA, SRI International.(PDF )
Penuel, W. R. (2008). Technical Report: Analysis of Effects of MathForwardTM on Student Achievement in Richardson Independent School District (RISD) MathForward Evaluation Research Series. R. Foshay. Menlo Park, CA, SRI International.(PDF )
Rivera, F. (2007). "Accounting for Students' Schemes in the Development of a Graphical Process for Solving Polynomial Inequalities in Instrumented Activity" Educational Studies in Mathematics.
Rivera, F. D. (2007). How graphing calculators build deep understanding: what one study says. TI EdTech Research Notes. R. Foshay. Dallas, TX. (PDF)
Roschelle, J. and L. Gallagher (2005). A Research Perspective on Using Graphing Calculator Interventions to Improve Mathematics Achievement. Palo Alto, CA, SRI International: 12. (PDF)
Roschelle, J. and C. Singleton (2008). Graphing Calculators: Enhancing Math Learning for All Students. International Handbook of Information Technology in Primary and Secondary Education. J. Vogt and G. Knezek. New York, Springer: 951-962.
Sabra, H. (2008). Revue d'articles francophones sur l'integration des calculatrices dans des mathematics, 2002-2008. L. Trouche. Lyon, France, INRP. (PDF)
Sinclair, M., H. Wideman, et al. (2008). TI-Navigator Study Interim Report. Toronto, York University. (PDF)
Spector, J. M., E. Jakubowski, et al. (2008). Investigating Pre-service Mathematics Teachers’ Initial Use of the Next-Generation TI-Nspire Graphing Calculators: A Case Study. Tallahassee, FL, Florida Center for Research on STEM education (FCR-STEM), Learning Systems Institute, Florida State University. (PDF)
SRI (2006). TI-Nspire™ Math and Science Learning Handhelds: What Research Says and What Educators Can Do. Menlo Park, CA, SRI International. (PDF)
Stroup, L. Carmona, et al. (2005). IMPROVING ON EXPECTATIONS: PRELIMINARY RESULTS FROM USING NETWORK-SUPPORTED FUNCTION-BASED ALGEBRA. Austin, TX, The University of Texas at Austin. (PDF)
Stroup, W., V. Pham, et al. (2007). Richardson Math Project. Austin, TX, University of Texas at Austin. (PDF)
Toenjes, L., J. Lewis, et al. (2004). Identifying Components of Effective Mathematics Programs. Eugene, OR, University of Oregon. (PDF)
Vendlinski, T. P., J. Morris, et al. (2008). A small randomized experiment in Algebra showed that when using TI-Nspire (in TI-84 mode), conceptual instruction followed by instruction that integrates both concepts and procedures was the most efficacious in helping students learn to begin writing linear equations. . Los Angeles, University of California - Los Angeles. (PDF)
Winick, M. and J. Lewis (2006). Year 1 Assessment of the RISD-TI Intervention Model. Redlands, CA, Winick & Lewis Research, LLC. (PDF)
Winick, M. and J. Lewis (2007). TI-Euclid City School District MathForward Intervention 2007 Year End Report. MathForward Evaluation Series. Dallas, TX, Texas Instruments. (PDF)
Winick, M. and J. Lewis (2007). Year 2 Assessment of MathForward in RISD. Redlands, CA, Winick & Lewis, LLC. (PDF)
|
|
|
