 |
What are the purposes for using the handheld in teaching and what are the effects of each type of use?
Effective teaching with graphics calculators can help learners develop a better understanding of mathematical concepts and use higher-level approaches to solving math problems.
A peer-reviewed meta-analysis of 54 of studies with the strongest form of evidence, high-quality experimental and quasi-experimental studies, concluded:
|
| | Learners with graphing technology had better understanding of functions, variables, solving algebra problems in applied contexts, interpreting graphs |
| | “Learners’ operational skills and problem-solving skills improved” |
Reference: (Ellington 2003), Virginia Commonwealth University
|
 |
| A discussion of current research “best evidence” concluded that learners who have been taught effectively with graphics calculators:
|
| | Use graphs |
| | Engage in problem solving |
| | Are more flexible in: |
| | – choosing solution strategies |
| | – making conjectures |
| | – moving among algebraic, numeric and graphical approaches |
| | – working with real data |
Reference: (SRI 2008) SRI, Inc., Menlo Park, CA
|
 |
| A UK review of 33 papers on ICT (including graphics calculators) in mathematics teaching found:
|
| | Gains in understanding of particular aspects of functions |
| | Learners reached higher levels of thinking and could explain their thinking better |
| | Learners do not always know how to use and interpret the technology |
| | Learning gains from small group work and interaction with the teacher |
Reference: (Goulding 2008), University of York
|
 |
| A review of 10 qualitative studies in France on the integration of graphics calculators in mathematics teaching concluded:
|
| | Graphics calculator environments tend to promote assimilation between a function and its graphical representations, while symbolic calculator environments tend to favour, within the limits of a function, more a point of view resulting from the calculation process. |
Reference: (Sabra 2008), INRP
|